ESG is understood to be an acronym for “environmental, social and governance,” but the term can be challenging because it’s used to describe similar but distinct communities of practice, including corporate social responsibility, socially responsible investing, corporate sustainability and impact finance.
In the 1980s, pension investor concerns for social and environmental issues evolved into what became known as socially responsible investing, which screened out investments that raised concerns over various human rights and environmental issues. This eventually spurred a corporate social responsibility (CSR) movement, pressuring corporations to take responsibility for the negative external impacts of their operations.
A global sustainability movement also began in the 1980s seeking to reconcile economic development with the protection of social and environmental balance. This was adapted in the private sector into corporate sustainability, an intentional strategy to create long-term value through improved social and environmental impact. Corporate sustainability differs from CSR in that the latter is often not driven by strategic business imperatives.
The investor perspective on financially material aspects of corporate sustainability coalesced under the term ESG, as famously used in a 2004 United Nations report issued by a coalition of 20 major financial institutions. The report included recommendations on integrating ESG value drivers into financial market research, analysis and investment. This was the birth of ESG, which has blossomed into an important asset class in worldwide financial markets.
Although ESG has become politically fraught in the United States, internationally ESG regulation is becoming pervasive. This issue details these global developments, which, with the potential to more closely align business imperatives with social good, are fundamentally altering standards of corporate responsibility and investment decisions and analysis.