Mary Kay McCalla Martire focuses her practice on a wide variety state and local tax issues. She advises clients on matters related to sales tax, with an emphasis on the sale of digital products. In addition, she advises business clients on income tax apportionment and remote employee withholding obligations. Mary Kay counsels individual clients on residency and income sourcing questions, and frequently advises captives and their insureds on direct procurement tax issues. She also has experience with state and local utility and telecommunications tax matters.

Mary Kay has an extensive litigation background in state and federal court, as well as administrative tribunals. She has particular experience in the defense of qui tam (whistleblower) claims filed in the state tax arena and has won the dismissal of many Illinois False Claims Act cases. Mary Kay played a key role in many of the reported decisions issued by the Illinois appellate court in this area. She also has experience defending clients against class action and consumer fraud claims.

Mary Kay also has represented clients in a number of state insurance tax litigation matters, including serving as the principal trial attorney for a group of insurance companies that successfully challenged the constitutionality of the Illinois Privilege Tax (Milwaukee Safeguard Ins. Co. v. Selky, 179 Ill.2d 94 (1997)).

Mary Kay serves as Co-Chair of the Chicago Office Pro Bono Committee. She is actively engaged in a number of pro bono matters, including the representation of not for profits seeking sales and property tax exemptions, and serving as a guardian ad litem in child custody disputes. In 2014, Mary Kay was awarded one of McDermott’s Chicago Office pro bono service awards. In addition, she is an editor of the Firm’s State Tax Blog, InsideSALT.com.

James A. Cannatti III advises healthcare, technology, and life sciences organizations on complex regulatory, compliance, and enforcement matters at the forefront of the evolving healthcare ecosystem. His practice spans digital health and health information technology (IT) policy, fraud and abuse compliance, and emerging regulatory risk areas, including in the diagnostics, life sciences services, research, pharmacy, and distribution space.

James counsels healthcare providers, diagnostics companies, health IT developers, and life sciences services and research companies on compliance with federal healthcare requirements, including the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and EKRA. He also represents clients in internal investigations and enforcement matters, drawing on his deep experience with government expectations and enforcement priorities to provide practical, regulator-informed guidance on navigating enforcement risk and regulatory change.

James’s advisory work frequently addresses cutting-edge regulatory topics and developments, including:

• Fraud and abuse risk and enforcement trends involving healthcare providers, diagnostics, laboratory services, and life sciences companies
• Internal investigations and responses to government inquiries involving the US Department of Justice and the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG)
• Compliance with the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018 in complex commercial arrangements
• Digital health enforcement and compliance risks, including remote patient monitoring and telehealth
• Information blocking and interoperability requirements under the 21st Century Cures Act
• Health IT certification, APIs, and data-sharing obligations

Before entering private practice, James spent more than a decade at the OIG, where he held a range of roles, including serving as its first Senior Counselor for Health Information Technology. In that role, he worked on the development, interpretation, and enforcement of federal healthcare policy affecting providers, health IT developers, and other industry stakeholders.

While in law school, James served as a managing editor of the Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution.