CASE STUDY
Read time: 10 min
The idea seems brilliantly simple: Create a digital health marketplace to connect doctors and patients online and streamline access to care.
Brilliant? Yes. Simple? No.
In 2007, when the Zocdoc cofounders came up with this concept, it was game changing. And in practice, by breaking new ground in the highly regulated healthcare industry, it was also fraught with legal and logistical complexity.
By 2016, to accelerate growth and expand access to care, Zocdoc wanted to shift its business model from flat-fee subscriptions to variable pricing (charging providers per patient booking). But the change risked violating the federal Anti-Kickback Statute – which could have forced the company to exclude Medicare and Medicaid patients, among others, from its services.
McDermott helped Zocdoc design a compliant pricing structure and secured two favorable Advisory Opinions from the HHS Office of Inspector General that validated the model and protected it from regulatory scrutiny.
This proactive legal strategy enabled Zocdoc to expand its provider network and patient access while maintaining compliance. The bottom line? When you make the right moves, legal complexity can become competitive advantage and fuel mission-driven business growth.
As an innovator, Zocdoc faced the early challenge of establishing practical, compliant privacy practices for both the services it provides to patients (its consumer users) and the services it provides on behalf of healthcare providers (its customers). McDermott’s privacy and data security team helped Zocdoc develop, implement, and update this dual-facing model.
With that foundation firmly in place, Zocdoc achieved brand recognition and significant revenue by 2015. However, its business model – based on a flat annual subscription fee for providers – limited Zocdoc’s business growth. The one-size-fits-all fee meant that some providers saw tremendous value, and others saw too little value, given the naturally unequal distribution of patient demand and bookings. This inequality also led to high churn, with many providers who received too few bookings – based on their specialty or geography – leaving the platform almost as quickly as Zocdoc could onboard new ones.
Limitations of the business model also constrained the supply of care and options for patients: Fewer providers on Zocdoc meant fewer options for patients seeking easily accessible care on their own timelines.
1
Legal strategy = business game changer
Zocdoc’s growth demonstrates how a proactive, business-minded legal strategy can drive innovation.
By embedding McDermott’s counsel into its business planning – from early brainstorming to regulatory submissions and courtroom defense – Zocdoc turned legal complexity into a competitive advantage. The partnership enabled Zocdoc to evolve from a startup into a profitable, mission-driven platform that now serves a broader, more diverse patient population and puts providers’ access to modern technology on more equal footing with that of other industries.
2
Cross-practice collaboration = business strength
McDermott’s ability to integrate regulatory foresight, litigation strength, and risk calibration ensured not only that Zocdoc could innovate within the law – but that it could defend that innovation when challenged.
As Zocdoc expands its offerings and impact, it does so on a foundation of legal clarity, strategic foresight, and trusted partnership.
3
Outside counsel = business growth
As Zocdoc continues to find ways to break through barriers in creating a more efficient and well-functioning US healthcare system – whether through services such as its Zo AI Phone Assistant, telehealth services, or policy advocacy – McDermott remains a critical partner.
The firm continues to help Zocdoc navigate ambiguity, anticipate regulatory shifts, and shape the future of digital healthcare.
Beyond regulatory wins, McDermott’s stature as a health law powerhouse played a pivotal role in helping Zocdoc build trust and buy-in with its healthcare provider customers. As Zocdoc transitioned them to the new variable model, McDermott’s deep credibility in the healthcare legal community reassured providers and their legal teams that the model was not just innovative, but firmly grounded in legal precedent.