Appeal Archives | McDermott Appeal Archives | McDermott

McDermott Will & Schulte, a global law firm

Keywords – External: Appeal

  • Report High level

    INSIGHT

    Antitrust M&A Snapshot
Q4 2025

    October – December 2025: Key themes and takeaways

    Apr 2, 2026

    Read time: 2 min

    Overview
    Video | 'The McDermott Difference'

    The fourth quarter of 2025 saw notable developments in antitrust M&A enforcement across major jurisdictions. In the United States, courts delivered multiple setbacks to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), rejecting narrow market definitions and vertical foreclosure theories, while accepting party‑proposed remedies as adequate solutions. The FTC adjusted its enforcement approach by moving away from parallel administrative actions and focusing instead on challenges in federal court. State attorneys general increased their involvement in merger reviews, intervening in a high-profile federal settlement in light of perceived improper lobbying influence.

    In the European Union, the European Commission cleared complex transactions through early engagement with merging parties, including deals involving supplier power and market consolidation. The United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority implemented new remedy guidelines emphasizing pace, predictability, proportionality, and process, with greater flexibility for behavioral remedies and pre‑notification discussions. Together, these developments reflect evolving enforcement priorities and approaches across jurisdictions.

    In this edition of Antitrust M&A Snapshot, we provide an in‑depth analysis of these trends and their potential impact on future transactions.

    In this issue
    More news

    Marshall E. Jackson , Jr.

    Partner

    Washington, DC

    Lisa Mazur

    Partner

    Chicago

    Stacey L. Callaghan

    Partner

    Chicago

    Jayda Greco

    Partner

    Chicago

    Patrick Zanayed

    Partner

    Chicago

    Abygail Hoey

    Associate

    New York – One Vanderbilt Avenue

    Agata Todarello

    Partner

    Milan

    More Insights

  • Report High level

    INSIGHT

    Antitrust M&A Snapshot
Q4 2025

    October – December 2025: Key themes and takeaways

    Apr 2, 2026

    Read time: 3 min

    Overview

    The fourth quarter of 2025 saw notable developments in antitrust M&A enforcement across major jurisdictions. In the United States, courts delivered multiple setbacks to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), rejecting narrow market definitions and vertical foreclosure theories, while accepting party‑proposed remedies as adequate solutions. The FTC adjusted its enforcement approach by moving away from parallel administrative actions and focusing instead on challenges in federal court. State attorneys general increased their involvement in merger reviews, intervening in a high-profile federal settlement in light of perceived improper lobbying influence.

    In the European Union, the European Commission cleared complex transactions through early engagement with merging parties, including deals involving supplier power and market consolidation. The United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority implemented new remedy guidelines emphasizing pace, predictability, proportionality, and process, with greater flexibility for behavioral remedies and pre‑notification discussions. Together, these developments reflect evolving enforcement priorities and approaches across jurisdictions.

    In this edition of Antitrust M&A Snapshot, we provide an in‑depth analysis of these trends and their potential impact on future transactions.

    In this issue
    More Antitrust M&A
    More Insights

  • Structuring the future of health

    INSIGHT

    The insider’s guide 
to evergreen funds

    Read time: 3 min

    Key takeaways

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
    Ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
    Consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam , quis nostrud
    Ex ea commodo consequat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed

    Lately, all eyes seem to be on evergreen funds. Among private credit funds, they’ve emerged as one of the hottest fund formats in recent years – but despite their growing popularity, these funds can be complex, and their mechanics are often misunderstood.
    If you have questions, you’re in the right place. Let’s demystify this increasingly popular fund structure.

    Market activity. Participants expressed mixed-optimism at HPE NYC. Forty-six percent of attendees polled believed deal activity would be “about the same” over the next 12 months, while 42% believed it will improve. Panelists leaned more optimistic as they pointed to growing market activity over the last year and an increase in the deal pipeline through 2025.
    Obstacles to healthcare PE transactions. Both panelists and attendees identified the lingering buyer-seller valuation gap as a major barrier facing Healthcare PE investors; 55% of attendees pointed to that valuation disconnect as the biggest challenge to successful deal executions. According to panelists, the gap is more pronounced in sectors where the lack of recent trades has made it particularly difficult for buyers and sellers to agree on valuations.
    Pharmaceuticals. Panelists addressed concerns over margin erosion and possible disruptions to pharmaceutical accessibility. The pharmaceutical industry is adjusting to potential changes in patient access to drugs, including a push to direct-to-consumer channels. That movement has begun and continues to trend.

    More Insights

  • Hot Topics in Medicare: What to Expect in 2026

    PODCAST

    Hot Topics in Medicare: What to Expect in 2026

    12

    About this episode

    hello

    More Insights

  • eo-14398-dei-restrictions-federal-contractor

    INSIGHT

    Executive Order 14398 imposes new DEI restrictions on Federal contractors

    Read time: 4 mins

    Key takeaways

    Although implementation is not immediate, the timeline is swift: Federal contractors and subcontractors should therefore carefully review their existing hiring, promotion, and compensation programs, as well as their purchasing and subcontracting programs, and work with legal counsel to ensure compliance with this new clause.

    Overview

    On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued Executive Order No. 14398, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors (the EO), 91 Fed. Reg. 16147 (Mar. 31, 2026). The EO sets forth a new contract clause to be inserted into contracts, contract-like instruments, and subcontracts at every level to prohibit Federal contractors from engaging in “racially discriminatory DEI activities” as defined by the EO.

    The EO requires all Executive departments and agencies to insert the clause into contracts and contract-like instruments within 30 days, additionally directing the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consistent with the EO. Federal contractors and subcontractors should review their hiring, promotion, and compensation programs, as well as their purchasing and subcontracting programs, and work with legal counsel to ensure that those programs comply with existing laws while maintaining alignment with company values.

    In depth

    If Congress does not reach an agreement prior to the expiration of these flexibilities on January 30, as of January 31, 2026, the Medicare telehealth flexibilities revert to pre-pandemic limitations:
    Return of geographic and originating site requirement. Medicare patients can only receive non-behavioral/mental-health telehealth services from specific originating sites, such as a provider’s office, a hospital, or a skilled nursing facility.
    Limited provider type eligibility. The list of providers eligible to provide Medicare covered telehealth services is limited to physicians, physician assistants, advanced practice registered nurses, certain behavioral health providers, and registered dietitians or nutrition professionals.
    Audio-only telehealth ends. Audio-only telehealth services will only be covered for behavioral/mental health.
    Rural health clinic/federally qualified health center flexibility as distant sites ends. These rural entities may no longer serve as distant sites for telehealth services other than behavioral/mental telehealth.
    Return of the mental health visit in-person requirement. For diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a behavioral health disorder via telehealth to be covered by Medicare, an in-person visit is required within six months before the initial telehealth visit and every 12 months thereafter, with limited exceptions.
    In addition to the expiration of the telehealth flexibilities, the Acute Hospital Care at Home waivers would expire on January 30, 2026.
    The Medicare telehealth flexibilities previously lapsed on October 1, 2025, when Congress failed to pass a continuing resolution funding the government and passing the health extenders. When Congress passed a funding bill six weeks later, the bill provided retroactive coverage for telehealth services furnished during the lapse.

    Authors

    Daniel P. Graham

    Partner

    Washington, DC

    Tara L. Ward

    Partner

    Washington, DC

    Emily Fallin

    Associate

    Washington, DC

    Elizabeth Hummel

    Associate

    Chicago

    More Insights